UUS Practice Tests⌕ Search
Physician Assistant Certification

NCCPA Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care CAQ Examination Practice Test

Palliative medicine and hospice care address symptom relief, quality of life, and decision-making for people with serious or life-limiting illness. The practice questions touch on pain and breathlessness, nausea and itching, spiritual and emotional distress, nutrition and hydration choices, and conversations about care preferences.

Exam overview

Exam providerNational Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants
Exam codeNot listed
CategoryPhysician Assistant Certification

About the NCCPA Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care CAQ Examination Exam

Effective palliative care requires matching symptom management to the likely cause, treatment burden, prognosis, and a patient’s goals. Clinical reasoning may include distinguishing movement-related breakthrough pain from pain at rest, considering medication options for nausea associated with impaired gastric motility, and assessing new itching alongside jaundice. Communication skills matter when patients or families raise concerns about feeding tubes, artificial hydration, voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, or the meaning of life with advanced illness. Good decisions involve eliciting what matters to the patient, explaining potential benefits and burdens in understandable terms, and responding without judgment. Care also includes recognizing when to consider specialist approaches, such as an interventional pain consultation, and supporting spiritual needs by offering appropriate resources with the patient’s consent.

Sample Practice Questions

Review a selection from this exam's published US Practice Tests practice bank.

Question 1

A patient with advanced illness reports spiritual distress and asks to speak with someone who understands their faith tradition. What is the most appropriate response?

  1. AOffer, with the patient's permission, referral to a chaplain or other spiritual-care resource the patient prefers
  2. BTell the patient that spiritual concerns are outside health care
  3. CAssume the patient's beliefs based on their family background
  4. DRedirect the conversation to medication without acknowledging the request
Show answerCorrect answer: A

Respectful spiritual care begins by asking about the patient's preferences and offering appropriate support, such as a chaplain or a faith-community contact. Clinicians should not assume beliefs or dismiss the concern.

Question 2

A patient with advanced cancer has persistent itching without a primary rash. The patient recently developed jaundice. What is the most appropriate initial approach?

  1. AAssess for cholestasis and other causes, then tailor symptom treatment to the likely mechanism
  2. BAssume the itching is psychological and reassure without further assessment
  3. CStart a topical antibiotic over the entire skin surface
  4. DRecommend hot showers and vigorous scrubbing
Show answerCorrect answer: A

Pruritus in serious illness can have medication-related, dermatologic, renal, or cholestatic causes. Jaundice raises concern for cholestasis, so identifying the likely mechanism helps guide treatment while providing skin-care measures for comfort.

Question 3

A patient with advanced illness is being evaluated for a feeding tube because of progressive difficulty swallowing. Which approach best supports an informed decision?

  1. ARecommend tube placement automatically because it prevents aspiration
  2. BClarify the swallowing problem, expected benefits and burdens, and the patient's goals before deciding
  3. CAssume that tube feeding will reliably improve comfort and survival
  4. DDefer discussion until the patient can no longer communicate
Show answerCorrect answer: B

Artificial nutrition decisions require discussion of the cause of dysphagia, likely outcomes, risks, alternatives, and the patient's values. A feeding tube does not reliably eliminate aspiration risk or improve outcomes in every advanced illness.

Question 4

A patient with advanced illness has persistent nausea without vomiting. There is no evidence of bowel obstruction, and the patient has not improved with initial symptom-directed measures. Which medication class is commonly considered for nausea related to impaired gastric motility?

  1. AProkinetic medication
  2. BAnticholinergic medication as the sole routine choice
  3. CLoop diuretic
  4. DAnticoagulant
Show answerCorrect answer: A

When impaired gastric emptying or motility is suspected and obstruction is not present, a prokinetic agent may be considered. Medication choice should account for likely cause, contraindications, and patient goals.

Question 5

A patient with advanced cancer develops sudden, severe pain with movement during dressing changes, despite good control of baseline pain at rest. What is the most appropriate approach?

  1. AGive an individualized short-acting analgesic before the predictable painful activity
  2. BStop the baseline analgesic until the dressing change is complete
  3. CUse a long-acting opioid only after the pain episode has ended
  4. DAvoid analgesia because movement-related pain is expected
Show answerCorrect answer: A

Predictable incident pain can often be reduced by giving a short-acting analgesic with enough lead time before the triggering activity. Continue to assess the pain pattern and response, and tailor the plan to the patient.

Question 6

A patient with advanced illness has severe, persistent pain from a vertebral metastasis despite medication. The patient asks whether a nerve block could be considered. What is the most appropriate next step?

  1. AExplain that interventional pain procedures are never appropriate in palliative care
  2. BDiscuss referral to an interventional pain specialist to assess whether a procedure fits the pain mechanism and goals
  3. CStop all analgesics before considering a procedure
  4. DRecommend a nerve block without evaluating the patient's overall condition or preferences
Show answerCorrect answer: B

Interventional approaches can be considered for selected refractory pain, but suitability depends on the pain source, expected benefit and burden, clinical status, and the patient's goals. A specialist assessment supports individualized decision-making.

Question 7

A patient with a life-limiting illness asks whether they may voluntarily stop eating and drinking. Which initial response is most appropriate?

  1. AImmediately characterize the request as suicidal intent and end the discussion.
  2. BExplore the patient's reasons, understanding, goals, and symptoms, and offer a careful discussion of likely consequences and available support.
  3. CPromise that stopping intake will be painless and predictable.
  4. DTell the patient that clinicians cannot discuss the choice.
Show answerCorrect answer: B

This request warrants a respectful, nonjudgmental conversation to understand the patient's goals, capacity, distress, and understanding of consequences. The clinician can discuss expected effects, symptom support, alternatives, and applicable ethical and legal considerations without making unsupported promises.

How to use this practice test

The free practice bank contains 50 published questions; each session presents up to 20 questions selected at random. Use a session to test clinical reasoning across symptom management and goals-of-care conversations, then review the results to identify areas for further study.

Preparation tips

  • For pain cases, distinguish persistent baseline pain from incident pain triggered by movement, and consider how the treatment approach should address each pattern.
  • When a symptom appears with a new clinical finding, such as itching with jaundice, connect the finding to possible causes before choosing symptom-directed care.
  • Practice explaining the potential benefits and burdens of feeding tubes and artificial hydration in language that supports an informed, patient-centered decision.
  • Prepare open-ended responses to spiritual distress, feelings of being a burden, and requests about voluntarily stopping eating and drinking; avoid assuming the patient’s beliefs or goals.
  • Review nonpharmacologic responses to breathlessness-related panic and when persistent symptoms may warrant specialist input.
Official sourceOfficial exam page ↗