UUS Practice Tests⌕ Search
Project Controls · CFCC

AACE Certified Forensic Claims Consultant Examination Practice Test

Forensic claims analysis examines disputed project events through contract language, contemporaneous records, schedule data, and cost evidence. The CFCC practice material uses scenarios about interpreting competing evidence, tracing claimed impacts, and presenting an analysis that readers can follow. Its subject matter connects delay and acceleration, changed work, differing site conditions, overhead calculations, and project management costs.

Exam overview

Exam providerAACE International Certification Institute
Exam codeCFCC
CategoryProject Controls

About the AACE Certified Forensic Claims Consultant Examination Exam

A claims consultant must distinguish documented facts from assumptions and explain how each affects entitlement or quantum. Schedule analysis involves identifying the critical path during the period at issue and testing whether an alleged delay affected project completion. Cost review calls for tracing charges to the work performed, reconciling accounting entries with event dates, and separating incremental effort from ordinary project activity. For acceleration claims, compare the claimed measures with evidence of what was actually implemented. Contract interpretation requires evaluating the relevant wording alongside project records and presenting unresolved alternatives fairly. A defensible analysis makes its sources, calculations, assumptions, and limitations transparent so another reviewer can reproduce the reasoning. These skills support independent review of construction and project claims without treating a cost entry, schedule update, or contract phrase as conclusive by itself.

Sample Practice Questions

Review a selection from this exam's published US Practice Tests practice bank.

Question 1

In a claim review, the contract and project records support several different interpretations of a disputed requirement. What is the most responsible way for an analyst to present the analysis?

  1. AState the interpretations, identify the supporting evidence and assumptions, and explain how each affects the analysis
  2. BChoose the interpretation most favorable to one party without disclosing alternatives
  3. COmit the disputed requirement from the analysis entirely
  4. DPresent a single conclusion while withholding material assumptions
Show answerCorrect answer: A

Transparent treatment of material competing interpretations allows readers to understand the evidentiary basis and sensitivity of the analysis. Concealing assumptions or alternatives undermines clarity and reproducibility.

Question 2

A reviewer finds that a cost was recorded in the accounting system several months after the related work occurred. What is the best next step?

  1. AReject the cost solely because of the posting delay
  2. BAccept it because the accounting system contains an entry
  3. CTrace the entry to source documentation and determine the transaction date, reason for late posting, and project attribution
  4. DMove the cost to the month in which the claim was submitted
Show answerCorrect answer: C

A delayed posting may be legitimate or may affect period attribution and reliability. Tracing the entry to invoices, approvals, receiving records, and other source documents helps establish what was incurred and when.

Question 3

A claim attributes additional cost to acceleration. What comparison is most useful for testing whether the claimed acceleration effort was actually implemented?

  1. ACompare the proposed acceleration plan with contemporaneous staffing, shift, and work records
  2. BCompare the project’s final cost with its original budget
  3. CCompare the contractor’s overhead rate with rates from unrelated projects
  4. DCompare the parties’ meeting attendance records
Show answerCorrect answer: A

Acceleration is an asserted effort or measure; contemporaneous implementation records can show whether additional shifts, crews, or other planned actions occurred. Cost and schedule records can then be evaluated against that evidence.

Question 4

When preparing an independent claim analysis, which practice best supports transparent and reproducible conclusions?

  1. AState assumptions, identify the records relied upon, and explain the analytical steps
  2. BPresent only the final total to avoid distracting detail
  3. CExclude evidence that does not support the preferred conclusion
  4. DChange methods between calculations without documenting the reason
Show answerCorrect answer: A

Documenting assumptions, evidence, and analytical steps allows another reviewer to understand and test the analysis. Balanced treatment of relevant evidence strengthens credibility.

Question 5

When evaluating whether a delay affected the project completion date, what is the primary purpose of identifying the critical path during the relevant period?

  1. ATo determine which activities had the lowest estimated cost
  2. BTo identify activities whose delay could affect the project completion date
  3. CTo establish whether every delayed activity was compensable
  4. DTo calculate the contractor’s overhead rate
Show answerCorrect answer: B

The critical path identifies the sequence of activities that governs the forecast completion date. Delays to activities on that path may affect completion, subject to the facts and schedule conditions.

Question 6

A claim includes labor costs for work performed under a change. Which evidence best supports the hours actually charged to that work?

  1. AA project completion certificate
  2. BA market survey of labor rates
  3. CDaily time records identifying workers, dates, and tasks
  4. DA summary of the original contract duration
Show answerCorrect answer: C

Daily time records tied to personnel and specific tasks provide direct support for the labor hours claimed. Rates and other cost components require separate substantiation.

Question 7

A contract uses a differing-site-condition clause that distinguishes between conditions materially different from those indicated and conditions ordinarily encountered. Which comparison is central to evaluating a Type I condition?

  1. AThe actual site condition versus the contract indications available to the contractor
  2. BThe actual site condition versus the contractor’s final cost estimate
  3. CThe actual site condition versus the owner’s preferred construction method
  4. DThe actual site condition versus the conditions encountered by every other contractor
Show answerCorrect answer: A

A Type I differing-site-condition analysis generally compares the encountered condition with the conditions indicated in the contract documents. The contract’s specific wording and the facts remain controlling.

How to use this practice test

The free practice session draws up to 20 random questions from the published CFCC bank of 50 questions. Use the scenarios to work through evidence, schedule, and cost reasoning; results appear after the session so you can identify which analytical decisions need more attention.

Preparation tips

  • For a disputed requirement, separate the contract wording from the factual record and note where the evidence permits more than one interpretation.
  • When assessing delay, identify the critical path for the period being analyzed and connect the alleged event to any effect on completion.
  • Trace claimed labor and management costs to contemporaneous time records, work descriptions, and accounting entries; investigate timing differences rather than assuming they invalidate a charge.
  • For acceleration or added-work claims, compare the claimed effort with records of implementation and verify the basis of any overhead calculation.
  • Present calculations with their source records, assumptions, and steps so an independent reader can reproduce the result.
Official sourceOfficial exam page ↗